After several seasons with Irish manufacturer O’Neills, Harlequins have signed up with Adidas, joining an elite group of Northern Hemisphere teams who are supplied by the German sportswear giant. Naturally, there’s been a lot of excitement and anticipation for the new gear from Quins fans, but that’s not the most important thing. No, the most important thing is what we think of it, obviously, so get on with it…
We should get this out of the way first, by means of an apology to Quins fans. While nobody can deny the heritage and distinctiveness of the Harlequins jersey, there’s no getting away from the fact that it’s… well… let’s be honest here – it’s just fuck ugly. Red, black, pale blue, green, brown and light grey (which always looks a bit washed out and almost beige to us). That’s not a coherent colour palette, those are the crayons a creepy five-year-old child uses to draw those vaguely troubling pictures that get him referred to a child psychologist.
Anyway, for a given value of good that a Quins shirt can be (and that is grading on a fairly generous curve), this is a pretty decent effort on the face of it. It’s a pretty inoffensive front of the shirt, with the Quins quarters not doing anything particularly out there, though new sponsor DHL’s logo does clash rather horribly. We’re not mad-keen on the sublimated harlequin pattern that’s strewn haphazardly across the front of the jersey either – the front of a Quins shirt is busy enough, without Adidas giving us flashbacks of booting up Windows 95…
The rear of the jersey, however, is where things start to get much more polarising. As you’d expect by now, Adidas’s standard ‘shoulder scarf’ panelling is in full effect here, and they’ve taken the pretty bold decision to make it stand out even more by making it green and white. For us, it’s just a bit much – there’s so many colours going on here anyway, such a big block of solid colour around the shoulders really makes things look haphazard.
And what’s with all the black? Rather than continue the quarters down the rear of the shirt for some reason, they’ve opted to cut it off half way up the back and make the rest of it black. Someone on Twitter christened this effect ‘the bum apron’ and we’re honestly struggling to think why you’d try to intentionally make the shirt look so incoherently designed.
Ironically, on the face of things, the away shirt is actually more palatable to us than the home. For one, the light grey actually looks grey here to us, no beige, as it does on the home shirt, an eternal plus let’s face it, but also, despite the intentionally messy nature of the design, it actually feels a lot more coherent.
We really like the way the designer has used large swathes of black to give an impressionistic take on the harlequin pattern, while keeping the overload of colours to a minimum. It’s not going to be a shirt for everyone, admittedly, but it’s bold, modern, and has a little bit of that Stade-esque madness that we can’t help but appreciate.
The back of the jersey is as simplistic as the front is busy. Again, we’ve got a bold, contrasting colour for the shoulder scarf, but this time we don’t think the red feels like it’s too much, in fact when paired with its red shorts, we think it ties the whole thing in pretty nicely.
So, two shirts very much at opposite ends of the traditional/modern scale, and yet two shirts that work in very different ways. We appreciate the way the home shirt tries to make the best of the Quins design to create something palatable, but it feels over-designed and over-complicated in places, and it kinda ruins it.
The away shirt couldn’t be more over-complicated if it tried, and yet somehow we think it really works. That said, it’s inherent busyness is going to alienate as many fans as it will attract.
All in all, this is a decent first go of things for Adidas. It almost feels like they’re trying to strike a balance between Stade-esque madness and Munster-esque traditionalism with these shirts, and have ended up with a bit of a mess of the two, but there’s some real promise here.
14 thoughts on “Harlequins 2014/15 Adidas Home & Alternate Shirts”
I’ve found a website as obsessed with kits as I have!
I agree with you with the home kit but I’m reserving judgement until i see it with the black shorts as I’m hoping the black will become more prominent and then it will look like the quins colours on a black background. It may be one of those shirts that looks good on the players but terrible in the stands.
I saw that away one at the sevens and it generally looks good apart from the front which is far too modern for my tastes.
I hoped for a classic type kit like they do for the All Blacks and Lions. I really wanted a proper collar like the Lions shirt.
Believe us Simon, we’re dangerously obsessed… We like the home kit it on the whole, but think it’s a bit too busy – it does look better with the shorts, but still not sure it needs that much black on the back.
I agree. I don’t get the “windows’ logo either.
Upon saying that theirs a very plain white training kit which has it on which looks ok.
We don’t mind the motif itself, but the front of the shirt is already SO busy, it just feels totally unnecessary…
windows logo quote made me laugh – good shot sir!
Could you explain when light grey became beige?
It’s always looked beige to us – maybe it’s the proximity to the brown, but whatever colour it’s supposed to be, it’s beige to our eyes…
It’s practically the same shade as this site’s background!
You heard the rumours about Tigers’ new away kit?
Exactly – and that’s beige!
Haven’t heard a thing actually – always keen to hear scurrilous rumour!
I hate to be the one to break this to you, but I think you might be colour-blind!
This is the background of your site: http://www.color-hex.com/color/eaeaea
This is the “Beige” quadrant of the shirt: http://www.color-hex.com/color/cacdd8
And this is what Beige actually looks like: http://www.color-hex.com/color/f5f5dc
Sorry to be a pedant! Might just be your monitor.
The Tigers shirt is supposedly going to be orange and black – presumably striped!
It will be worn during their pre-season “double header” on the 29th(?).
It’s got too much brown in it to be grey for us. It’s a very light beige, yes, but not grey – it’s almost exactly the same colour of late-1980s computer equipment… but maybe we’re colourblind. We’re standing by it!
Canterbury have shown some form for trying something pretty daring with their alternate kits this year, if it is that colour, we’re keen to see it!
Sorry its defo grey. My classic shirt would confirm.
It might have been grey once, but there’s a definite beige hue in the modern shirts. We’re sticking to our guns!
Beige? You insult all true kiwi cricket fans, this is beige http://www.beigebrigade.co.nz/